Players are often overlooked when talking about greatness. Goose Gossage had to wait far too long to hear his name announced as a Hall of Fame inductee. He had to feel the utter shame and humiliation of watching Bruce Sutter be elected before him. Sutter is without question one of the 10 most suspect Hall of Fame inductees in the history of baseball. There are plenty of arguments about players who are eligible and have yet to be elected, Jim Rice, Bert Blyleven and Andre Dawson are the most immediately recognizable names. However, one name is always overlooked and that player is still active—Mike Mussina.
Some might argue that Mussina’s overall numbers are not Hall of Fame worthy. Without question, those
people have failed to actually look at how truly dominating Mussina has been over his career, and continues to be. Currently, Mussina is 21st all time in strikeouts, and should move into the top 20 in his next start and should pass Cy Young by the end of this season. If that’s not enough, Mussina has demonstrated considerable control over his career. Mussina has a better strikeout to walk ratio than the king of control, Greg Maddux.
We often talk about the best pitchers of this generation to be Clemens, Johnson, Schilling, Smoltz, Martinez and Glavine. Yet, in a nutshell, Moose dominates Glavine and is on the same plane as Schilling and Smoltz. Clemens, Johnson and Martinez are on a different playing field completely. However, the dominant will always fall in line to the elite. For every Drysdale, there’s a Koufax. For every Young there is a Johnson and for every Carlton, there is a Johnson. Greatness transcends time. The benchmark for talent is often Walter Johnson, who many feel is the best pitcher to ever throw a ball. That argument can certainly be made successfully. However, there is pure dominance following him, and Mussina belongs on that list.
The argument can be made that he doesn’t have the wins to be elected into the Hall of Fame. Wins are a team statistic, and should not affect a pitcher’s credentials. Afterall, a hitter isn’t affected when a pitcher throws a strike, why should a pitcher be affected when a hitter drives in a run? If we are to use wins to measure a pitcher’s success, should we not use winning percentage? After all, if one pitcher has significantly more innings pitched, he is apt to have a higher lump sum total. Mussina’s .638 winning percentage is good enough for 38th all time, ahead of the king of wins himself, Cy Young. In fact, of the 23 members of the 300 win club, only 4 have a higher winning percentage than Mussina: Lefty Grove, Christy Mathewson, Roger Clemens and Grover Cleveland Alexander. Even with a majority of Mussina’s career coming on mediocre teams, he has still managed to land himself in the top 35 all times in wins, something the writers can not overlook.
Bill James often says that Hall of Famers are measured by their closest comparables. Mussina’s closest comparable, by a wide margin, is Juan Marichal. Today, no one is arguing with the Dominican Dandy’s position in Cooperstown. His comparable list also goes on to include Schilling and Gibson. For all of the media attention given to the players who talk and make a big deal of themselves, the one who has been amongst the most consistent and dominant might be the one overlooked. In a world with constant media attention and increased ability in hitters, the quiet and unassuming Mussina has been just what pitching needed: a throwback pitcher who flat out dominates and rewrites record books. Does Mussina need to reach the 3000 strikeout and 300 win plateau to reach it to Cooperstown? For his sake, hopefully not.

Continuing the look ahead to 2009, we find our first sinkerball pitcher, Alex White.
As we continue to look ahead to the 2009 draft, there is one hitter who is head and (tar)heels above the rest—Dustin Ackley.
han Mark Prior.


